Introduce variables for canny stuff instead of hardcoding
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,16 +17,16 @@ static double angle( Point pt1, Point pt2, Point pt0 )
|
||||
return (dx1*dx2 + dy1*dy2)/sqrt((dx1*dx1 + dy1*dy1)*(dx2*dx2 + dy2*dy2) + 1e-10);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void Processing::processImage(Mat& inputPicture, int thresholdValue, int gaussKernelSize)
|
||||
void Processing::processImage(Mat& inputPicture, int thresholdBinary, int gaussKernelSize, int thresholdCanny1, int thresholdCanny2, int apertureSizeCanny)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//Idea here is: Processing module consists of two methods:
|
||||
// One (this) to do all kinds of stuff to the picture (grayscale conversion, threshold, gauss etc etc)
|
||||
// And one (the other one) to segment the lines.
|
||||
// No return value here as the input is passed by reference -> directly modified.
|
||||
cvtColor(inputPicture, inputPicture, COLOR_BGR2GRAY);
|
||||
threshold(inputPicture, inputPicture, thresholdValue, 255, THRESH_BINARY);
|
||||
threshold(inputPicture, inputPicture, thresholdBinary, 255, THRESH_BINARY);
|
||||
GaussianBlur(inputPicture, inputPicture, Size(gaussKernelSize, gaussKernelSize), 0);
|
||||
Canny(inputPicture, inputPicture, 50, 100, 3);
|
||||
Canny(inputPicture, inputPicture, thresholdCanny1, thresholdCanny2, apertureSizeCanny);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<Vec4i> Processing::calculateLineSegments(const Mat& inputPicture)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ public:
|
||||
// End und Anfangspunkt analysieren und Winkel und Ausrichtung der Linie extrahieren (Abstand des untersten Punktes von der Mitte)
|
||||
~Processing();
|
||||
|
||||
void processImage(Mat& inputPicture, int thresholdValue, int gaussKernelSize);
|
||||
void processImage(Mat& inputPicture, int thresholdBinary, int gaussKernelSize, int thresholdCanny1, int thresholdCanny2, int apertureSizeCanny);
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<Vec4i> calculateLineSegments(const Mat& inputPicture);
|
||||
};
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user